Ithaca Democrats will vote in a Town Supervisor Primary on Tuesday. Since the two candidates are pretty close on the issues, the race has come down to a difference in management style that in some ways mirrors the difference between professional v. political described yesterday. Town Board members believe that the Supervisor, Cathy Valentino, has increasingly become autocratic. She is, self-appointed, the only spokesperson for the Town; she works tirelessly and unilaterally behind the scenes and presents issues tied up with a ribbon as faits accompli. Her opponent, Herb Engman, prefers a system of committees--composed both of citizens and of board members--that will chew over issues and advise the board. Obviously, Cathy's way is more efficient. Herb's way is messy, time-consuming, democratic.
I described school board governance to our county chair once, and she commented that it seemed awfully undemocratic. When I look into how school boards evolved that way, it seems to come down to one guy--
John Carver. He is a writer and lecturer on what he terms "policy governance"--copyrighted!--which is essentially the professional model writ large and applied to all kinds of organizations that are not corporate, including school boards. He speaks often of the tension between rubberstamping and micromanaging, and I agree that there's a balance to be found there. But his emphasis is on speaking with one voice.
My board training with NYSSBA never once spoke about representation. It spoke about unity, consensus (which I do believe is a sensible goal), leadership. While the NYSSBA lists these roles for a school board member:
Representative - of the entire community
Steward - of the district’s resources
Leader - of the district
Advocate - for public education;
only Steward and Leader are stressed through board training. I think that's because Representative is difficult to incorporate without breaking out of the consensus mold--or becoming an individual rather than part of a whole. I've read several articles (almost all by former superintendents!) that complain about board members who politicize board meetings. Mostly they're talking about city boards that have real campaigns for board seats, I think, but in some cases they seem to be concerned that the Representative piece of the job is getting in the way of the other, more professional, less messy roles.